Need continuous Protect now
ShareGate Protect (or SysKit). ShareSight will not pretend.
Compare
ShareGate Protect alternativefor permissions and oversharing
ShareGate Protect is continuous Microsoft 365 governance. Trustholm ShareSight is the fastest path to a trustworthy Access Evaluation and offline pack. We do not replace ShareGate Migrate.
Choose ShareGate Protect when continuous crawl and day-2 owner workflows are the buying centre. Choose ShareSight when you need a scoped permissions and oversharing answer this workshop week, with Sites.Selected preferred and an offline HTML/CSV/ZIP pack.
Protect vs Migrate - Access Evaluation wedge - When Protect wins is explicit
Protect versus Migrate (do not confuse them)
ShareGate is a product family. ShareGate Migrate moves and validates content. ShareGate Protect is the SaaS governance product for permissions, sharing, oversharing, and ongoing review.
Trustholm ShareSight competes with Protect on the access question. Trustholm Migrate competes with ShareGate Migrate on content move. This page is only about permissions and oversharing. If your RFP is a migration seat band, leave this page and talk to Migrate or keep ShareGate Migrate.
Where ShareGate Protect is strong
Protect is built for continuous Microsoft 365 governance: tenant crawl cadence, permissions matrix freshness, oversharing and Copilot exposure narrative, remediation and activity logging, and a self-serve admin workspace model. Enterprise buyers also get mature commercial and trust marketing, including SOC messaging we will not copy as a fake badge.
If that operating model is what you already funded, Protect should stay on the shortlist. ShareSight will not pretend to be Protect with different paint.
Where ShareSight wins
ShareSight wins when the job is answer this workshop week. Connect with Sites.Selected preferred. Toggle SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and Exchange. Leave with severity boards, matrix views, and an offline pack IM can forward. Remediate only with human approval. Re-scan on a retainer when drift matters.
That is the ShareGate Protect alternative conversation for permissions: speed, honesty, offline evidence, AU gov packaging, and bundle with Migrate. It is not a claim that ShareSight is a full Protect replacement on day one.
When Protect should win the deal
You need continuous crawl freshness as a contractual requirement. You need owner review workflows at Protect scale. You need the ShareGate commercial relationship you already trust. You are not blocked on getting a first answer this month.
In those cases, buy or keep Protect. Use ShareSight only if you still need a scoped Access Evaluation pack while Protect onboarding runs, or for Exchange-heavy mailbox questions Protect does not centre.
SEO intent: ShareGate Protect alternative for permissions
Buyers searching sharegate protect alternative or sharegate alternative permissions usually want either continuous governance cheaper, or a faster answer to oversharing. ShareSight owns the second intent with Access Evaluation, offline packs, Sites.Selected preferred, and honest Gaps.
We will not print an unverifiable number-one badge. We will publish compare pages, how-it-works method pages, and client paths so the permissions conversation is clear. Content migration remains Trustholm Migrate versus ShareGate Migrate, never this page.
Practical evaluation plan
Try the ShareSight demo estate. Book an Access Evaluation with ShareSight selected. Bring three questions: which workloads matter this week, can we stay on Sites.Selected, and do remediations require human approval. Run the workshop. Compare the pack quality to Protect onboarding timelines.
If Protect already owns continuous crawl in your estate, keep it. If the board needs an answer before Protect is live, ShareSight is the ShareGate Protect alternative for permissions that ships a pack. That is the decision this page is for.
Side by side
Best for Trustholm
Agencies, MSPs, and mid-market teams that need Access Evaluation speed, offline packs, least-privilege connect, and human-approved remediation across SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and Exchange.
Best for incumbent
Organisations that want continuous tenant crawl, near-fresh permissions matrix, owner review programmes, and a mature Protect-class SaaS operating model as the default.
| Capability | Trustholm | ShareGate Protect |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first trustworthy answer | Fixed-fee Access Evaluation + offline pack | Licence + onboard continuous platform first |
| Continuous estate crawl | Scheduled re-scan / retainer (not Protect-class default) | Core Protect strength |
| Offline HTML/CSV/ZIP for IM/privacy | Core deliverable | Exports / product UI |
| Exchange Online mailbox delegates | Included in M365 / Mailbox AE | Often weaker in Protect marketing vs SP/OD |
| Teams membership + channel sites | First-class workload (not Teams admin console) | Teams/Groups governance surfaces in Protect |
| Least-privilege connect | Sites.Selected preferred | Broad SaaS consent models typical |
| Content migration | Trustholm Migrate (sibling) | ShareGate Migrate (separate product) |
| Silent bulk remediation | No. Human approval required | Remediation workflows in Protect |
Decision shortcuts
Match the job, not the logo.
Need Access Evaluation this week
ShareSight. Demo estate, then live consent and pack.
Need content move
ShareGate Migrate or Trustholm Migrate. Not this page.
Shipped versus honest gaps
Shipped
- Access Evaluation as the Protect alternative wedge for permissions
- Four workloads including Teams and Exchange
- Permissions matrix / who-boards and sharing-link centre
- Offline pack + human-approved remediation
- Explicit Protect vs Migrate disambiguation
Honest gaps
- Not continuous Protect-class crawl / 24h matrix freshness
- Not full Protect platform breadth (inactive workspace suite, marketplace scale)
- No SOC 2 product certification claim
- Live AE needs Entra configured
Shopping a ShareGate Protect alternative for permissions?
If you need continuous crawl, keep Protect. If you need Access Evaluation this workshop week, book ShareSight and bring the workloads that matter.
Frequently asked questions
- Is ShareSight a full ShareGate Protect replacement?
No. It is the alternative when Access Evaluation speed and an offline pack are the job. Protect wins on continuous crawl and day-2 operating model.
- Is ShareSight a ShareGate Migrate alternative?
No. Content migration is Trustholm Migrate or ShareGate Migrate.
- Do you have a permissions matrix?
Yes for Access Evaluation depth: site/library - principal views with nested group notes. We do not market it as continuous estate-fresh Protect matrix.
- Do you cover Teams?
Yes as a first-class workload for membership and channel sites. Not a Teams admin console.
- Do you cover Exchange Online?
Yes for calendar delegates and well-known folder permissions. That is often a ShareSight wedge versus Protect-heavy SharePoint narratives.
- Can we run ShareSight and Protect together?
Yes. Use ShareSight for a scoped pack while Protect onboarding runs, or keep ShareSight for mailbox-heavy questions.
- Do you claim SOC 2 like ShareGate marketing?
No. We do not copy competitor certification headlines.
- How do we evaluate?
Try the demo estate, then book an Access Evaluation with ShareSight selected.