How is ShareSight different from ShareGate Protect or SysKit Point?

Those platforms are continuous Microsoft 365 governance products: tenant crawls, permissions matrices, day-2 remediation. ShareSight is the fastest path to a trustworthy answer for a scoped estate: connect, pick SharePoint / OneDrive / Teams / Exchange workloads, scan, review, and leave with an offline HTML/CSV/ZIP pack. Start with a fixed-fee Access Evaluation; expand to deep audits and retainers when you need ongoing drift. Read the ShareGate compare page for Protect versus Migrate disambiguation.

Is ShareSight a ShareGate alternative?

For permissions and oversharing visibility, yes that is the SEO and buying conversation we own. We are not a ShareGate Migrate alternative (that is Trustholm Migrate). We are not a full Protect replacement if your requirement is continuous estate crawl on day one. We win when you need Access Evaluation speed, an offline pack, least-privilege connect, and honest coverage.

We already have Microsoft SharePoint Advanced Management / Copilot. Do we still need this?

Native Data Access Governance reports are a strong baseline when Copilot is licensed. Use them first for admin-centre visibility. ShareSight is for when IM, privacy, or security need a forwardable evidence pack across SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and Exchange, a workshop readout with honest coverage notes, not another admin console export.

Do you cover Teams, OneDrive, and Exchange as well as SharePoint?

Yes. After connect, toggle SharePoint sites, OneDrive by person, Teams membership and channel sites, and Exchange calendars/folders. One offline pack with workload filters on Review. Mailbox Access Evaluation is the Exchange-only package; M365 Access Evaluation covers the multi-workload workshop.

Do you install anything in our Microsoft 365 tenant or Azure subscription?

Not for the main path. ShareSight is hosted by Trustholm. Your ICT admin grants consent; we read sharing and permissions from our control plane.

How complete is a first scan?

Access Evaluation uses scoped sites, OneDrive people, teams, and/or mailboxes with depth and sampling you agree in workshop. Coverage notes list what was walked, what was sampled, and blind spots per workload. Deep Library Audit is the paid full unique-permission walk on named high-risk libraries. We do not pretend every first scan is estate-complete.

Where does data live, and for how long?

Scan artefacts live in the Trustholm control plane for the engagement retention window (default 90 days unless the statement of work says otherwise). See the company trust hub for broader Trustholm posture.

How does this relate to Trustholm Migrate?

Migrate moves and validates content from TRIM / Content Manager into SharePoint. ShareSight proves who can see what across sites, personal drives, Teams, and mailboxes, before records land, during hypercare, or as a standalone estate health review. They share branding and consulting motion; they are separate engagements.

See what's shared.Across Microsoft 365.

A permissions and oversharing map for SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and Exchange Online, so IM, ICT, and security can answer exposure questions before Copilot or the next audit amplifies them.

Admin consent once. Pick the workloads that matter. Run a scoped scan. Leave with an offline report pack for the readout room, without installing anything into your SharePoint farm.

4Workloads in one pack

1Admin consent to connect

ZIPHTML + CSV report pack

Try the demo estate Book an Access Evaluation

Self-serve trial is the demo estate · Fixed-fee Access Evaluation · Live tenant when Entra is ready

The problem

Microsoft 365 access is hard to explain, and AI makes it urgent

Sites, personal drives, Teams membership, and mailboxes each hide who can open what. Inheritance, groups, guests, anyone-links, calendar delegates, and folder permissions stack until nobody can answer a simple question. Copilot then searches everything a user can already reach.

SharePoint maze

Broken inheritance and unique permissions hide who can open a library. PowerShell theatre does not help a readout room.

Teams and OneDrive sprawl

Guest owners, shared channels, and personal Anyone links sit outside a SharePoint-only review. Copilot still reaches them.

Mailbox and Copilot blast radius

Calendar delegates and Inbox folder permissions grant quiet access. Oversharing that sat quiet for years becomes an answer in chat.

Outcomes

What a first Access Evaluation delivers

Not another platform to learn. A workshop week that leaves IM, ICT, and security with the same map across the workloads you enable.

A shared answer

Critical Anyone links, High guests and delegates, Medium unique-permission density, ranked with location and who-has-access evidence, filterable by workload.

An offline pack

HTML, CSV, and ZIP you can forward to privacy, audit, or the executive without granting another admin console.

A clear next step

Deep Library Audit, Mailbox Access Evaluation, Remediation Sprint, or Quarterly Re-scan, only where the evidence says it is needed.

Workloads

SharePoint · OneDrive · Teams · Exchange

One product, four collectors. Toggle workloads after connect. Leave with a single evidence pack and workload filters on Review.

SharePoint

Sites, libraries, Anyone / org / specific links, and unique permissions. Prefer least-privilege connect so you do not hand over the keys to the whole tenant by default.

OneDrive

Personal drives by owner, without pasting cryptic my.sharepoint URLs. Same link and guest classifiers as SharePoint.

Teams

Team and channel membership, private and shared channel sites, guest and template-drift findings. Not a Teams admin or app-governance console.

Exchange Online

Calendar delegates plus well-known folder permissions (Inbox, Tasks, Contacts). Mailbox-only packages when that is the job.

How it works

Connect to Microsoft 365, do not sit in it

Your ICT admin grants consent to the Trustholm app. ShareSight reads sharing and permissions from our hosted control plane. Nothing installed in your farm.

Connect

Admin consent once. Prefer narrow SharePoint access when it still answers the question. Document OneDrive, Teams, and Exchange scopes honestly.

Workloads and scope

Toggle SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and Exchange. Shortlist sites, people, teams, and mailboxes with depth and sampling you agree in the workshop.

Scan and review

Risk-ranked findings, who/where boards, permissions matrix views, and honest coverage notes. Then HTML, CSV, and ZIP for the readout.

Harden over time

Propose remediations with human approval, save snapshots, and track drift on a retainer when you are ready.

Full how it works

Capabilities

What ShareSight looks for

Built for the access question competitors market as oversharing governance, scoped across workloads, evidence-ranked, and honest about depth.

Sharing links

Anyone / anonymous links, organisation-wide links, and specific-people sharing on sites and personal drives that open records beyond intent.

Guests, delegates, and external

Guest users, external identities, Everyone-style principals, Teams guests, and Exchange calendar/folder delegates ranked by severity.

Permissions matrix and unique ACLs

Site/library × principal views, broken inheritance density, nested group paths (bounded), and well-known mailbox folder permissions.

Who / where boards

Every finding points back to a site, team, personal drive, or mailbox location and principal so the readout stays factual, filterable by workload.

Coverage honesty

Depth, sampling, permission gaps, and per-workload blind spots listed in the pack. We do not claim continuous estate-complete crawls by default.

Remediation with approval

Propose revoke and harden actions across workloads; execute only with human approval and an audited change log.

What you see

Evidence-ranked access findings

Severity language your security team recognises, packaged for people who will never live in the SharePoint, Teams, OneDrive, or Exchange admin centres.

Critical

Anyone links and passwordless anonymous sharing

High

Guests, external users, delegates, shared-channel external, Everyone-style principals

Medium

Unique permission density, folder access drift, excessive team owners, orphaned principals

Coverage

Honest notes on depth, sampling, and blind spots per workload

Compare

How ShareSight sits beside the market

Honest fit. We compete on the access map and Access Evaluation engagement, not on becoming ShareGate Migrate or a full continuous Protect platform.

Full compare pages

Need	ShareSight	ShareGate Protect / SysKit	Microsoft SAM	Consulting DIY
Answer this workshop week	Best fit Access Evaluation + pack	Licence + onboard first	Admin reports if Copilot/SAM ready	Possible, uneven packs
SharePoint + OneDrive + Teams + Exchange in one pack	Core M365 Access Evaluation	Platform breadth (licence-led)	SharePoint-focused admin reports	Separate scripts per workload
Offline HTML/CSV/ZIP for IM/privacy	Core Core deliverable	Exports / product UI	Admin centre exports	Ad hoc
Continuous tenant crawl + owner reviews	Scheduled re-scan / retainer	Best fit Best fit	DAG + site access reviews	Project-based
Least-privilege connect	Preferred Sites.Selected preferred	Broad SaaS consent models	Native admin roles	Often full-control scripts
AU gov / records packaging	Best fit Primary GTM	Global SaaS voice	Native Microsoft	Firm-dependent
Content migration	Migrate (sibling product)	ShareGate Migrate (separate)	Not the job	Separate SoW

ShareGate Protect wins when you need continuous estate crawl and day-2 owner workflows as the default. ShareSight wins when you need a trustworthy Access Evaluation this workshop week. Deep pages: ShareGate, SysKit Point, AvePoint Insights.

Built for

IM, ICT, cyber, privacy, and MSPs

One access map that each function can take into their own conversation.

IM / records

Know whether records libraries, personal drives, Teams, and mailboxes are overshared, and forward the HTML pack without teaching four admin centres.

ICT / Microsoft 365

Find unique-permission sprawl, Teams guests, OneDrive links, and calendar delegates without PowerShell theatre or full-control consent by default.

Cyber and privacy

Anonymous links, org-wide sharing, external principals, and folder access ranked with evidence for audit and incident playbooks.

Client paths

Trust

Security posture we will stand behind

Competitor pages lead with SOC badges. We lead with what is actually built, and what is not yet claimed.

Shipped

Hosted connect via Microsoft 365 admin consent
SharePoint + OneDrive + Teams + Exchange workloads in one product
Permissions matrix / who-boards and sharing-link centre
Encrypted token storage and redaction on exports
Human-approved remediation path with audited change log
Scheduled re-scan and Critical/High alert path
Default retention window (typically 90 days)

Honest gaps

No SOC 2 / ISO certification claims yet
Not a continuous Protect-class tenant crawl by default
Teams is membership + channel sites, not a Teams admin console
Nested group expansion is bounded (not infinite)
Exchange subfolders beyond well-known Calendar/Inbox/Tasks/Contacts are out of scope
Live Access Evaluation needs Entra app consent configured

Trust hub · Security

Engagements

Start with Access Evaluation

Fixed-fee workshop: connect, pick workloads, scoped scan, report pack, and readout. Typical delivery within one workshop week once consent exists. Payment default: 50% kickoff / 50% report.

M365 Access Evaluation

Fixed fee · SharePoint + OneDrive + Teams + Exchange · one offline pack

Workload picker after admin consent
Sites, OneDrive people, teams, and mailbox shortlist
Combined Review with workload filters
HTML/CSV/ZIP evidence pack + executive readout

Access Evaluation

Fixed fee · SharePoint-scoped workshop + pack

Kickoff + site shortlist
Least-privilege connect path preferred
Government-default policy pack options
Optional OneDrive / Teams / Exchange add-on to M365 AE

Mailbox Access Evaluation

Fixed fee · Exchange calendars and folder access

Calendar delegates + Inbox/Tasks/Contacts
Mailbox-scoped workshop path
Offline pack + optional remediation proposals

Deep Library Audit

Fixed per library band · Full unique-permission walk

Named high-risk libraries
Complete unique-permission walk
Evidence URLs per finding

Remediation Sprint

Fixed or T&M cap · Guided revoke and harden

Human-approved writes only
Audited change log across workloads
No silent background strip

Quarterly Re-scan

Retainer · Snapshot drift vs last baseline

Scheduled re-scan
Drift report + Critical alerts path
Retainer readout

Pair with Migrate

Use ShareSight before records land, during hypercare, or as a standalone estate health review for agencies already on Microsoft 365. Migrate moves content; ShareSight proves who can see it, on sites, personal drives, Teams, and mailboxes.

Explore Migrate

Ready for a clear Microsoft 365 access map?

Book an Access Evaluation with Trustholm, or try the synthetic demo estate in minutes. No credit card, no farm install.

Frequently asked questions

How is ShareSight different from ShareGate Protect or SysKit Point?: Those platforms are continuous Microsoft 365 governance products: tenant crawls, permissions matrices, day-2 remediation. ShareSight is the fastest path to a trustworthy answer for a scoped estate: connect, pick SharePoint / OneDrive / Teams / Exchange workloads, scan, review, and leave with an offline HTML/CSV/ZIP pack.
Start with a fixed-fee Access Evaluation; expand to deep audits and retainers when you need ongoing drift. Read the ShareGate compare page for Protect versus Migrate disambiguation.
Is ShareSight a ShareGate alternative?: For permissions and oversharing visibility, yes that is the SEO and buying conversation we own. We are not a ShareGate Migrate alternative (that is Trustholm Migrate). We are not a full Protect replacement if your requirement is continuous estate crawl on day one. We win when you need Access Evaluation speed, an offline pack, least-privilege connect, and honest coverage.
We already have Microsoft SharePoint Advanced Management / Copilot. Do we still need this?: Native Data Access Governance reports are a strong baseline when Copilot is licensed. Use them first for admin-centre visibility. ShareSight is for when IM, privacy, or security need a forwardable evidence pack across SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and Exchange, a workshop readout with honest coverage notes, not another admin console export.
Do you cover Teams, OneDrive, and Exchange as well as SharePoint?: Yes. After connect, toggle SharePoint sites, OneDrive by person, Teams membership and channel sites, and Exchange calendars/folders. One offline pack with workload filters on Review. Mailbox Access Evaluation is the Exchange-only package; M365 Access Evaluation covers the multi-workload workshop.
Do you install anything in our Microsoft 365 tenant or Azure subscription?: Not for the main path. ShareSight is hosted by Trustholm. Your ICT admin grants consent; we read sharing and permissions from our control plane.
How complete is a first scan?: Access Evaluation uses scoped sites, OneDrive people, teams, and/or mailboxes with depth and sampling you agree in workshop. Coverage notes list what was walked, what was sampled, and blind spots per workload. Deep Library Audit is the paid full unique-permission walk on named high-risk libraries. We do not pretend every first scan is estate-complete.
Can you revoke sharing links and fix permissions?: Remediation Sprint proposes changes and executes only with human approval and an audited change log. We do not silently strip permissions in the background.
Where does data live, and for how long?: Scan artefacts live in the Trustholm control plane for the engagement retention window (default 90 days unless the statement of work says otherwise). See the company trust hub for broader Trustholm posture.
How does this relate to Trustholm Migrate?: Migrate moves and validates content from TRIM / Content Manager into SharePoint. ShareSight proves who can see what across sites, personal drives, Teams, and mailboxes, before records land, during hypercare, or as a standalone estate health review. They share branding and consulting motion; they are separate engagements.