This page describes product capabilities for your control matrix. Trustholm does not hold SOC 2, ISO 27001, IRAP, Essential Eight, CMMC, Cyber Essentials, NIS2, or framework certification badges.
The NIS2 Directive strengthens cybersecurity risk management for essential and important entities across the European Union, and explicitly brings managed service providers and managed security service providers into scope when they provide ICT services to in-scope customers.
MSPs serving EU regulated clients may introduce Trustholm as an ICT supply-chain subprocess for signed script orchestration and audit export. Trustholm does not claim NIS2 certification, conformity assessment outcomes, or national transposition badges for the product.
Supply-chain and vendor transparency
NIS2 and national implementing laws expect in-scope entities to manage ICT supply-chain risk. Buyers typically require: subprocessors list at /trust/subprocessors, architecture overview, security questionnaire pre-fill, incident notification assumptions, and honest gap disclosure (WORM audit immutability backlog, native SIEM connector backlog).
Trustholm publishes Shipped/Gap evidence tables on the trust hub for vendor diligence files.
Security measures relevant to privileged automation
Technical measures that support Article-style security-of-networks narratives in customer assessments include schema-per-tenant isolation, JWT tenant binding for portal users, MFA options, signed PowerShell policy before execution, and exportable security audit trails separate from HTTP request logs.
Organisational measures-personnel access reviews, vulnerability management on customer endpoints, incident response execution-remain MSP and end-customer obligations.
Incident handling and reporting chains
NIS2 reporting obligations apply to in-scope entities under national law. Trustholm documents support escalation and notification terms in enterprise contracts; MSPs map those terms into customer IR playbooks and supervisory notification chains. Marketing pages cannot substitute for contractual incident schedules.
MSP positioning in EU supply-chain reviews
Include Trustholm vendor evidence when your customer or your own NIS2 program evaluates ICT subprocessors. Clarify complement positioning: many MSPs retain US RMM tools for patch and monitoring while using Trustholm for governed script execution evidence-reducing single-vendor dependency for privileged automation audit.
Pair this page with GDPR processor framing, DORA ICT risk content where financial clients apply, and /govern/resources/digital-sovereignty-eu-msp-saas for residency questions. Govern early access evaluations should export audit evidence and capture IAM configuration within the first week.
Limitations: NIS2 outcomes depend on entity classification, member-state transposition, contract tier, and supervisory expectations-marketing pages cannot certify your compliance program.
Procurement tip: Attach EU vendor pack from /govern/trust/downloads and subprocessors list before legal review cycles begin. Request enterprise DPA drafts via security@trustholm.com.